References

References

Chapter 1

1. Freeman, J., and Rossi, J. “Improving Interagency Coordination in Shared Regulatory Space”. Administrative and Regulatory Law News, vol 38, (2012): 11-14.

2. Marks, G. W., and Hooghe, L. “Contrasting Visions of Multi-Level Governance. In I. Bache & M. Flinders (Eds.)”, Multi-Level Governance. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online, (2004): 15-30.

3. Peters, B. G. “Managing Horizontal Government: The Politics of Co-Ordination.” Public Administration, vol 76 no 2, (1998): 295-311.

4. Peters, B. G. “Toward Policy Coordination: Alternatives to Hierarchy.” Policy & Politics, vol 41 no 4, (2013): 569-584.

5. Lindsay, C., McQuaid, R. W., and Dutton, M. “Inter-Agency Cooperation and New Approaches to Employability.” Social Policy & Administration, vol 42 no 7, (2008): 715-732.

6. Bjurstrøm, K. H. “How Interagency Coordination is Affected by Agency Policy Autonomy.” Public Management Review, (2019): 1-25.

7. Bouckaert, G., Peters, B. G., and Verhoest, K. “Resources, Mechanisms and Instruments for Coordination.” The Coordination of Public Sector Organizations: Shifting Patterns of Public Management. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, (2010): 34-66.

8. Alexander, E. R. How Organizations Act Together: Interorganizational Coordination in Theory and Practice. New York: Psychology Press, 1995.

9. Bardach, E. “Turf Barriers to Interagency Collaboration.” The State of Public Management, (1996): 168-192. 

10. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. “The Reorganization of the Former MMS.” https://www.boem.gov/about-boem/reorganization/reorganization-former-mms

11. Epstein, G., Pittman, J., Alexander, S. M., Berdej, S., Dyck, T., Kreitmair, U., . . . Armitage, D. “Institutional Fit and the Sustainability of Social–Ecological Systems.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, vol 14, (2015): 34-40.

12. Folke, C., Pritchard, R., Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Svedin, U. “The Problem of Fit between Ecosystems and Institutions: Ten Years Later.” Ecology and Society, vol 12 no 1, (2007): 30.

13. Cumming, G. S., Cumming, D. H. M., and Redman, C. L. “Scale Mismatches in Social-Ecological Systems: Causes, Consequences, and Solutions.” Ecology and Society, vol 11 no 1, (2006): Article 14.

14. Davidson, S. L., and De Loë, C. “Watershed Governance: Transcending Boundaries.” Water Alternatives, vol 7 no 2, 2014.

15. Kim, S.Y., Swann, W.L., Weible, C.M., Bolognesi, T., Krause, R.M. . Park, A. Y. S. , Tang, T., Maletsky, K. and Feiock, R.C. “Updating the Institutional Collective Action Framework.” Policy Studies Journal, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12392

16. Feiock, R. C. “The Institutional Collective Action Framework.” Policy Studies Journal, vol 41 no 3, (2013), 397-425.

17. Peters, B.G. “The Challenge of Policy Coordination.” Policy Design and Practice, vol 1 (2018): 1-11.

18. Rossignoli, C., and Ricciardi, F. “Theories Explaining Inter-Organizational Relationships in Terms of Coordination and Control Needs.” In C. Rossignoli & F. Ricciardi (Eds.), Inter-Organizational Relationships, Switzerland: Springer, (2015): 7-36.

19. Schafer, J.G.. “Mandates to Coordinate: The Case of the Southern Nevada Public Lands Management Act”, Public Performance & Management Review, vol 40, (2016): 23-47.

20. Hansen, K., Mullin, M., and Riggs, E.K. “Collaboration Risk and the Choice to Consolidate Local Government Services”, Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, vol 3, (2020): 223-38.

21. Rodríguez, C., Langley, A., Béland, F., and Denis, J. “Governance, Power, and Mandated Collaboration in an Interorganizational Network”, Administration & Society, vol 39, (2007): 150-93.

22. Scott, T. A., and Thomas, C. W. “Unpacking the Collaborative Toolbox: Why and When Do Public Managers Choose Collaborative Governance Strategies?” Policy Studies Journal, vol 45 no 1, (2017): 191-214.

23. Saz-Carranza, A., Iborra, S., and Albareda, A. “The Power Dynamics of Mandated Network Administrative Organizations.” Public Administration Review, vol 76 no 3, (2016): 449-462.

24. Moseley, A., and James, O. “Central State Steering of Local Collaboration: Assessing the Impact of Tools of Meta-Governance in Homelessness Services in England”, Public Organization Review, vol 8 (2008): 117-36.

 

Chapter 2

25. Tedeschi, D, Rodgers, M.E., Harding, S., and Djoukeng, F. A Guide to the Basics of International Law. Washington, DC: The Writing Center at Georgetown University, 2019. https://www.law.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/A-Guide-to-the-Basics-of-Intl-Law.pdf.

26. Council of State Governments. “Understanding Interstate Compacts." Accessed 1/30/21. https://www.gsgp.org/media/1313/understanding_interstate_compacts-csgncic.pdf.

27. United States Government Accountability Office. Interstate Compacts: An Overview of the Structure and Governance of Environment and Natural Resource Compacts. Washington, DC, 2007. https://www.gao.gov/assets/260/258939.pdf.

28. Kincaid, V. and Stager, R. Know Your Options: A Guide to Forming Groundwater Sustainability Agencies. Sacramento, CA: California Water Foundation, 2015. http://www.stancounty.com/er/pdf/groundwater/gsa-guide.pdf.

29. United States Coast Guard. “Commandant Instructions 5216.18." Accessed 1/30/21. https://media.defense.gov/2017/Mar/13/2001710658/-1/-1/0/CI_5216_18.PDF.

30. Bernstein, A. “An Introduction to Joint Powers Authorities, their Funding Mechanisms, and Why California should Utilize One in Order to Create an Effective Forest Management System to Prevent Wildfires." Hastings Business Law Journal 16, vol 16 no 2, (2020): 231. https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_business_law_journal/vol16/iss2/7.

31. Cypher, T. and Grinnell, C. Governments Working Together: A Citizen’s Guide to Joint Powers Agreements. Sacramento, CA: California State Legislature, Senate Local Government Committee, 2007. https://sgf.senate.ca.gov/sites/sgf.senate.ca.gov/files/GWTFinalversion2.pdf.

32. U.S. Office of Personnel Management. “Effective Teams Strive for Consensus." Accessed 1/9/21. https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/performance-management/teams/effective-teams-strive-for-consensus/.

33. Hefte, R. “Benefits to Consensus Decision Making." University of Minnesota Extension. Accessed 1/9/21. https://extension.umn.edu/leadership-development/benefits-consensus-decision-making.

34. Draper, S.E. “Administration and Institutional Provisions of Water Sharing Agreements." Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 133, vol 133 no 5, (2007): 446-455. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2007)133:5(446).

35. Burgman, M.A., Regan, H.M., Maguire, L.A., Colyvan, M., Justus, J., Martin, T.G., and Rothley, K. “Voting Systems for Environmental Decisions." Conservation Biology 28, vol 28 no 2, (2014): 322-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12209.

 

Chapter 3

36. The Institute for Local Government. Understanding the Basics of Local Agency Decision-Making. Sacramento, CA, 2009. https://www.hpca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/4120/Local-agency-decision-making?bidId=.

37. Harrington. E.A. (Vice Chair of the Londonderry Conservation Commission) in discussion with the author, April 2021.

38. U.S Office of Management and Budget. “A Citizen’s Guide to the Federal Budget Fiscal Year 2001”. Accessed 5/7/21. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BUDGET-2001-CITIZENSGUIDE/pdf/BUDGET-2001-CITIZENSGUIDE.pdf.

39. Taylor, D. and Andrews, C. The New Hampshire Municipal Conservation Fund Guidebook. Concord, NH: Society for the Protection of New Hampshire Forests, 2010. https://forestsociety.org/sites/default/files/nh-municipal-conservation-fund-guidebook.pdf.

40. Justia. “Notice and Comment Process for Agency Rulemaking”. Accessed 5/11/21. https://www.justia.com/administrative-law/rulemaking-writing-agency-regulations/notice-and-comment/.

 

Chapter 4

41. Ackoff, R.L. “From Data to Wisdom." Journal of Applied Systems Analysis vol 16 no 1, (1989): 3-9.

42. Karkkainen, B. C. “Managing Transboundary Aquatic Ecosystems: Lessons from the Great Lakes." Pac.McGeorge Global Bus.& Dev.LJ  vol 19, (2006): 209.

43. Raadgever, G.T., Mostert, E., Kranz, N., Interwies, E., and Timmerman, J.G. “Assessing Management Regimes in Transboundary River Basins: Do they Support Adaptive Management?" Ecology and Society vol 13 no 1, (2008).

44. Van der Molen, F. “How Knowledge Enables Governance: The Coproduction of Environmental Governance Capacity." Environmental Science & Policy vol 87, (2018): 18-25.

45. Grossman, M. “Cooperation on Africa’s International Water Bodies: Information Needs and the Role of Information-Sharing." In Transboundary Water Management in Africa—Challenges for Development Cooperation. Bonn, Germany: German Development Institute, 2006.

46. Elhance, A.P. “Hydropolitics: Grounds for Despair, Reasons for Hope." International Negotiation vol 5 no 2, (2000): 201-222.   

47. Dombrowsky, I. “Institutional Design and Regime Effectiveness in Transboundary River Management – The Elbe Water Quality Regime." Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions vol 4 no 3, (2007): 1625-1661.

48. O’Mahony, S. and Bechky, B.A. “Boundary Organizations: Enabling Collaboration among Unexpected Allies." Administrative Science Quarterly vol 53 no 3, (2008): 422-459.

49. Lemos, M.C., Bell, A.R., Engle, N.L, Formiga‐Johnsson, R.E., and Nelson, D.R. “Technical Knowledge and Water Resources Management: A Comparative Study of River Basin Councils, Brazil." Water Resources Research vol 46 no 6, (2010).

50. Reed, M.S., Evely, A.C., Cundill, G., Fazey, I., Glass, J., Laing, A., Newig, J., Parrish, B.,  Prell, C. and Raymond, C. “What is Social Learning?" Ecology and Society vol 15 no 4, (2010).

51. Vinke-de Kruijf, J, Bressers, H., and Augustijn, D.C. “How Social Learning Influences further Collaboration: Experiences from an International Collaborative Water Project." Ecology and Society vol 19 no 2, (2014).

52. Cundill, G. and Rodela, R. “A Review of Assertions about the Processes and Outcomes of Social Learning in Natural Resource Management." Journal of Environmental Management vol 113, (2012): 7-14.

 53. Pahl-Wostl, C. “A Conceptual Framework for Analysing Adaptive Capacity and Multi-Level Learning Processes in Resource Governance Regimes." Global Environmental Change vol 19 no 3, (2009): 354-365.

 54. Drieschova, A and Eckstein, G. “Cooperative Transboundary Mechanisms." In Transboundary Water Governance: Adaptation to Climate Change, edited by Sanchez, Juan Carlos and Joshua Roberts. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for the Conservation of Nature, 2014. https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/44675.

 55. Gooch, G. D. “The Communication of Scientific Information in Institutional Contexts: The Specific Case of Transboundary Water Management in Europe." In Environmental Information in European Transboundary Water Management, edited by Timmerman, JG and S Langaas. London, UK: IWA Publishing, 2004.

56. Timmerman, J.G. and Langaas, S. “Water Information: What is it Good for? the use of Information in Transboundary Water Management." Regional Environmental Change vol 5 no 4, (2005): 177-187.

57. United States Geological Survey. “Data Standards."  Accessed 1/29/2. https://www.usgs.gov/products/data-and-tools/data-management/data-standards.

58. Schuurman, N., Deshpande, A., and Allen, D.M. “Data Integration Across Borders: A Case Study of the Abbotsford‐Sumas Aquifer (British Columbia/Washington State)"  Journal of the American Water Resources Association vol 44 no 4, (2008): 921-934.

59. Dallmeier-Tiessen, S., Darby, R., Gitmans, K., Lambert, S., Matthews, B., Mele, S., Suhonen, J. and Wilson, M. “Enabling Sharing and Reuse of Scientific Data." New Review of Information Networking vol 19 no 1, (2014): 16-43.

60.  Yang, T. and Maxwell, T.A. “Information-Sharing in Public Organizations: A Literature Review of Interpersonal, Intra-Organizational and Inter-Organizational Success Factors." Government Information Quarterly vol 28 no 2, (2011): 164-175.

61. Landsbergen, D. and Wolken, G. Eliminating Legal and Policy Barriers to Interoperable Government Systems. Columbus, OH: Ohio Supercomputer Center, ECLIPS Program, 1998.

62. Dawes, S.S. “Interagency Information Sharing: Expected Benefits, Manageable Risks." Journal of Policy Analysis and Management vol 15 no 3, (1996): 377-394.

63. Plengsaeng, B., Wehn, U., and Van Der Zaag, P.. “Data-Sharing Bottlenecks in Transboundary Integrated Water Resources Management: A Case Study of the Mekong River Commission’s Procedures for Data Sharing in the Thai Context." Water International vol 39 no 7, (2014): 933-951.

64. Thu, H.N. and Wehn,U. “Data Sharing in International Transboundary Contexts: The Vietnamese Perspective on Data Sharing in the Lower Mekong Basin." Journal of Hydrology vol 536, (2016): 351-364.

65. Burch, T.K. “Computer Simulation and Statistical Modeling: Rivals Or Complements?" In Model-Based Demography, 67-77. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2018.

66. Wickens, T. D. Models for Behavior: Stochastic Processes in Psychology. WH Freeman & Co Ltd, 1982.

67. Milman, A. and Ray, I. “Interpreting the Unknown: Uncertainty and the Management of Transboundary Groundwater." Water International vol 36 no 5, (2011): 631-645.

68. Cabello, V., Kovacic, Z., and Van Cauwenbergh, N. “Unravelling Narratives of Water Management: Reflections on Epistemic Uncertainty in the First Cycle of Implementation of the Water Framework Directive in Southern Spain." Environmental Science & Policy vol 85, (2018): 19-27.

69. Hasan, H.M. 2009. “A Taxonomy of Modes of Knowledge Sharing between Disparate Groups." Paper presented at Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS). Hyderabad, India: Indian School of Business. https://ro.uow.edu.au/commpapers/682.

70. Yang, T., Pardo, T., and Wu, Y. “How is Information Shared Across the Boundaries of Government Agencies? An E-Government Case Study." Government Information Quarterly vol 31 no 4, (2014): 637-652.

71. Schuurman, N., Deshpande, A., and Allen, D.M. “Data Integration Across Borders: A Case Study of the Abbotsford‐Sumas Aquifer (British Columbia/Washington State)." Journal of the American Water Resources Association vol 44 no 4, (2008): 921-934.

72. Lemos, M.C. and Morehouse, B.J. “The Co-Production of Science and Policy in Integrated Climate Assessments." Global Environmental Change vol 15 no 1, (2005): 57-68.

73. Djenontin, I.N. S. and Meadow, A.M. “The Art of Co-Production of Knowledge in Environmental Sciences and Management: Lessons from International Practice." Environmental Management vol 61 no 6, (2018): 885-903.

74. Oliver, K., Kothari, A., and Mays, N. “The Dark Side of Coproduction: Do the Costs Outweigh the Benefits for Health Research?" Health Research Policy and Systems vol 17 no 1, (2019): 1-10.

75. Doubleday, R., and Wynne B. “Despotism and Democracy in the United Kingdom.” In Reframing Rights: Bioconstitutionalism in the Genetic Age, edited by Jasanoff S, Caplan A., 239–261: MIT Press, 2011.